Design, synthesis and apoptotic effects of novel benzoxazole compounds.

A series of new benzoxazole-hydrazone and benzoxazole-1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives have been designed, synthesized and evaluated as cytotoxic agents toward human A549 lung cancer cells. Compounds 3d, 3e, 5b, 5c, 5d and 5e were the most potent compounds with IC50 values of <3.9, 10.33, 11.6, 5.00, <3.9 and 4.5 µg/mL, respectively, which are higher than reference drug cisplatin (IC50 = 19.00 µg/mL). The flow cytometry-based apoptosis detection assay was performed to determine their effects on apoptosis in A549 cells. All tested compounds induced apoptosis in A549 cell line.

Comparison between tafamidis and liver transplantation as first-line therapy for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: By stabilizing transthyretin, tafamidis delays progression of amyloidosis due to transthyretin variant (ATTRv) and replaced liver transplantation (LT) as the first-line therapy. No study compared these two therapeutic strategies. METHODS: In a monocentric retrospective cohort analysis, patients with ATTRv amyloidosis treated with either tafamidis or LT were compared using a propensity score and a competing risk analysis for three endpoints: all-cause mortality, cardiac worsening (heart failure or cardiovascular death) and neurological worsening (worsening in PolyNeuropathy Disability score). RESULTS: 345 patients treated with tafamidis (n = 129) or LT (n = 216) were analyzed, and 144 patients were matched (72 patients in each group, median age 54 years, 60% carrying the V30M mutation, 81% of stage I, 69% with cardiac involvement, median follow-up: 68 months). Patients treated with tafamidis had longer survival than LT patients (HR: 0.35; p = .032). Conversely, they also presented a 3.0-fold higher risk of cardiac worsening and a 7.1-fold higher risk of neurological worsening (p = .0071 and p < .0001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ATTRv amyloidosis patients treated with tafamidis would present a better survival but also a faster deterioration of their cardiac and neurological statuses as compared with LT. Further studies are needed to clarify the therapeutic strategy in ATTRv amyloidosis.

Association of Tafamidis With Health Status in Patients With ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ATTR-ACT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tafamidis reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and minimized patient-reported health status deterioration at 30 months in patients with transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis. However, the clinical significance of health status changes remains unclear, particularly in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III symptoms who experienced more cardiovascular-related hospitalizations than those with NYHA class I-II symptoms. Objective: To evaluate the health status of patients taking tafamidis with baseline NYHA class III symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial post hoc analysis evaluated data for patients with transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis and NYHA class I-III symptoms at baseline who were enrolled in ATTR-ACT, a placebo-controlled study of tafamidis held at 48 sites in 13 countries. Interventions: Tafamidis meglumine, 80 mg or 20 mg (pooled cohort), vs placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Established thresholds for clinical benefit on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) were used to define response groups (very large decline to very large improvement); the proportion of patients in each group was calculated within each baseline NYHA class. Results: Among 441 patients (264 tafamidis, 177 placebo), the mean (SD) age was 74.3 (7.0) years; 398 (90%) were male and 43 (10%) were female. Mean (SD) baseline KCCQ-OS scores were 67.3 (21.4) in the tafamidis group and 65.9 (21.7) in the placebo group (range: 0-100, with 100 indicating the best health). There was a significant shift toward better KCCQ-OS scores in patients receiving tafamidis (odds ratio for 10-point improvement 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4; P < .001). More patients taking tafamidis were alive and not worse at all time points (37% vs 15% at month 30). These findings were similar in patients with NYHA class III symptoms. In patients with NYHA class III symptoms alive at 30 months, improvements in health status were more common (35% vs 10%) and declines were less common (38% vs 57%) with tafamidis vs placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: In ATTR-ACT, although patients with baseline NYHA class III symptoms had worse overall outcomes, treatment with tafamidis yielded better health status compared with placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01994889.

Long-term survival in people with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy who took tafamidis: A Plain Language Summary.

WHAT IS THIS PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary presents the results from an ongoing, long-term extension study that followed an earlier study called ATTR-ACT. People who took part in this extension study and ATTR-ACT have a type of heart disease known as transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM for short), which causes heart failure and death. In ATTR-ACT, people took either a medicine called tafamidis or a placebo (a pill that looks like the study drug but does not contain any active ingredients) for up to 2½ years. So far, in the long-term extension study, people have continued taking tafamidis, or switched from taking a placebo to tafamidis, for another 2½ years. Researchers looked at how many people died in ATTR-ACT and the extension study. The long-term extension study is expected to end in 2027, so these are interim (not final) results. WHAT DID RESEARCHERS FIND OUT?: In the extension study of ATTR-ACT, the risk of dying was lower in people who took tafamidis continuously throughout ATTR-ACT and the extension study than in people who took placebo in ATTR-ACT and switched to tafamidis in the extension study. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Taking tafamidis increases how long people with ATTR-CM live. People with ATTR-CM who take tafamidis early and continuously are more likely to live longer than those who do not. These results highlight the importance of early detection and treatment in people with ATTR-CM. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01994889 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02791230 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study.

AIM: Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist. METHODS: In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels. RESULTS: The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (-46.1% vs. -34.7%, p＜0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%, p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%, p＜0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly higher in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (14/60 vs. 3/60, p =0.004) [corrected]. CONCLUSION: Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function.

Tafamidis polyneuropathy amelioration requires modest increases in transthyretin stability even though increases in plasma native TTR and decreases in non-native TTR do not predict response.

BACKGROUND: TTR aggregation causes hereditary transthyretin (TTR) polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN) in individuals with destabilised TTR variants. ATTRv-PN can be treated with ligands that bind TTR and prevent aggregation. One such ligand, tafamidis, is widely approved to treat ATTRv-PN. We explore how TTR stabilisation markers relate to clinical efficacy in 210 ATTRv-PN patients taking tafamidis. METHODS: TTR concentration in patient plasma was measured before and after tafamidis treatment using assays for native or combined native + non-native TTR. TTR tetramer dissociation kinetics, which are slowed by tafamidis binding, were also measured. RESULTS: Native TTR levels increased by 56.8% while combined native + non-native TTR levels increased by 3.1% after 24 months of tafamidis treatment, implying that non-native TTR decreased. Accordingly, the fraction of native TTR increased from 0.54 to 0.71 with tafamidis administration. Changes in native and non-native TTR levels were uncorrelated with clinical response to tafamidis. TTR tetramer dissociation generally slowed to an extent consistent with ∼40% of TTR being tafamidis-bound. Male non-responders had a lower extent of binding. CONCLUSIONS: Native and non-native TTR concentration changes cannot be used as surrogate measures for therapeutic efficacy. Also, successful tafamidis therapy requires only moderate TTR stabilisation. Male patients may benefit from higher tafamidis doses.

Relationship of binding-site occupancy, transthyretin stabilisation and disease modification in patients with tafamidis-treated transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Tafamidis inhibits progression of transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) by binding TTR tetramer and inhibiting dissociation to monomers capable of denaturation and deposition in cardiac tissue. While the phase 3 ATTR-ACT trial demonstrated the efficacy of tafamidis, the degree to which the approved dose captures the full potential of the mechanism has yet to be assessed. METHODS: We developed a model of dynamic TTR concentrations in plasma to relate TTR occupancy by tafamidis to TTR stabilisation. We then developed population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models to characterise the relationship between stabilisation and measures of disease progression. RESULTS: Modelling individual patient data of tafamidis exposure and increased plasma TTR confirmed that single-site binding provides complete tetramer stabilisation in vivo. The approved dose was estimated to reduce unbound TTR tetramer by 92%, and was associated with 53%, 56% and 49% decreases in the rate of change in NT-proBNP, KCCQ-OS, and six-minute walk test disease progression measures, respectively. Simulating complete TTR stabilisation predicted slightly greater reductions of 58%, 61% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the value of TTR stabilisation as a clinically beneficial treatment option in ATTR-CM and the ability of tafamidis to realise nearly the full therapeutic benefit of this mechanism. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01994889.

Impact of Tafamidis on Survival in a Real-World Community-Based Cohort.

Tafamidis is the only therapy shown to improve survival in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) based on randomized controlled trial data. We sought to evaluate the impact of tafamidis on survival in a real-world community-based cohort. This was a prospective observational cohort study that included consecutive patients with confirmed ATTR based on biopsy or TcPYP imaging. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients taking tafamidis vs not, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare survival between these groups. We examined the reasons that ATTR patients were not on tafamidis. Of 107 ATTR patients, median age was 83.9 years, 79% were men, and 63 (59%) of them were on tafamidis. Demographics and baseline cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between those on vs off tafamidis, although there was a higher proportion of NYHA Class III or IV heart failure in those off tafamidis (76% vs 57%, P < 0.01). The most common reasons patients were not on tafamidis included delays in obtaining the drug or financial barriers (59%) and NYHA Class IV heart failure (19.5%). Patients taking tafamidis had a significantly higher median survival compared to those not on tafamidis (median survival 6.70 vs 1.43 years, P < 0.0001). Our study demonstrates significantly improved survival in ATTR patients taking tafamidis. Barriers exist to tafamidis initiation including delayed access and affordability, and efforts should be made to improve patient access.

Discovery of a novel class of benzoxazole derivatives as histamine H3 receptor ligands for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

To discover effective analgesics, we summarize the synthesis, optimization, and pharmacological anti-nociceptive effects of a novel series of benzoxazole derivatives targeting H3 receptor (H3R). The new benzoxazoles were assayed in vitro for histamine H3R and H1R binding affinity. The best compound 8d (2-methyl-6-(3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)propoxy)benzo[d]oxazole) exhibited high affinity for H3R (Ki = 19.7 nM), high selectivity for ten other off-target receptors, and negligible effects on human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG, cardiac ion channel). In rodent animals, compound 8d dose-dependently reversed formalin-evoked pain (Phase I, ED50 = 6.0 mg/kg; Phase II, ED50 = 7.8 mg/kg) and CCI-induced neuropathic pain (chronic constriction injury, ED50 = 15.6 mg/kg). Furthermore, compound 8d showed an excellent safety profile in acute toxicity test (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg) with a therapeutic index (TI = LD50/ED50) > 250 and showed a desirable drug-like pharmacokinetic profile. Above characteristics indicate that compound 8d represents a promising candidate analgesic for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Synthesis and In-Vivo Evaluation of Benzoxazole Derivatives as Promising Anti-Psoriatic Drugs for Clinical Use.

2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-5-benzoxazoleacetic acid (CBA) and its ester, methyl-2-(4-chloro-phenyl)-5-benzoxazoleacetate (MCBA), were synthesized, and their structures were confirmed by 1HNMR, IR, and mass spectrophotometry. The anti-psoriatic activities of CBA and MCBA were tested using an imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriatic mouse model, in which mice were treated both topically (1% w/w) and orally (125 mg/kg) for 14 days. The erythema intensity, thickness, and desquamation of psoriasis were scored by calculating the psoriasis area severity index (PASI). The study also included the determination of histopathological alterations in the skin tissues of treated mice. Topical and oral administration of CBA and MCBA led to a reduction in erythema intensity, thickness, and desquamation, which was demonstrated by a significant decrease in the PASI value. In addition, skin tissues of mice treated with CBA and MCBA showed less evidence of psoriatic alterations, such as hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, scale crust, edema, psoriasiform, and hyperplasia. After administration of either topical or oral dosing, the anti-psoriatic effects were found to be stronger in MCBA-treated than in CBA-treated mice. These effects were comparable to those produced by Clobetasol propionate, the reference drug. This drug discovery could be translated into a potential new drug for future clinical use in psoriasis treatment.

[Practice guideline for the treatment of familial amyloid polyneuropathy]. / Guía de práctica clínica de tratamiento de la polineuropatía amiloidótica familiar.

This clinical practice guideline for the treatment of familial amyloid polyneuropathy is based on the best available evidence of clinical effectiveness. A list of questions was generated with a PICO format focused on the effectiveness and safety of the treatment of familial amyloid polyneuropathy. The search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane and Epistemonikos. The levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were based on the GRADE system. Recommendations were graded according to their direction and their strength and were evaluated with the GLIA tool for their implementation. In patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy and stage I and II neuropathy, it is suggested: inotersen 300 mg subcutaneous weekly or patisirán 0.3 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks, since they probably stabilize or slow the progression of neuropathy and worsening quality of life (moderate quality of evidence; strength of recommendation weak). In patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy and stage I neuropathy, treatment with tafamidis 20 mg orally, once a day, is suggested, as it could slow the progression of neuropathy and worsen quality of life (low quality of evidence; strength of recommendation weak). In patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy and symptomatic neuropathy and in the absence of other treatments with approved efficacy, treatment with oral diflunisal 250 mg twice daily is suggested, as it could prevent the progression of neuropathy (quality evidence low; strength of recommendation weak).

Esta guía de práctica clínica de tratamiento de la polineuropatía amiloidótica familiar se basa en la mejor evidencia disponible de efectividad clínica. Se generó un listado de preguntas con formato PICO centradas en efectividad y seguridad del tratamiento de polineuropatía amiloidótica familiar. Se realizó la búsqueda en PubMed, Cochrane y Epistemonikos. Los niveles de evidencia y los grados de recomendación se basaron en el sistema GRADE. Las recomendaciones se graduaron según dirección y fuerza y se evaluaron con la herramienta GLIA para su implementación. Resumen de recomendaciones: En pacientes con polineuropatía amiloidótica familiar y neuropatía estadio I y II, se sugiere el tratamiento con inotersen 300 mg subcutáneo semanal o patisirán 0.3 mg/kg endovenoso una vez cada 3 semanas, dado que, probablemente, estabilicen o enlentezcan el avance de la neuropatía y el empeoramiento de la calidad de vida (calidad de la evidencia moderada; fuerza de la recomendación débil). En pacientes con polineruropatía amiloidótica familiar y neuropatía estadio I, se sugiere el tratamiento con tafamidis 20 mg vía oral, una vez por día, ya que podría enlentecer el avance de la neuropatía y el empeoramiento en la calidad de vida (calidad de la evidencia baja; fuerza de la recomendación débil), y aquellos con polineuropatía amiloidótica familiar y neuropatía sintomática y en ausencia de otros tratamientos con eficacia aprobada, se sugiere el tratamiento con diflunisal 250 mg dos veces al día, vía oral, ya que podría evitar la progresión de la neuropatía (calidad de la evidencia baja; fuerza de la recomendación débil).

[Specific pharmacological treatment guide for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, 2021]. / Guía de tratamiento farmacológico específico de la cardiomiopatía amiloidótica por transtiretina, 2021.

This clinical practice guideline for treating transthyretin amyloid (ATTR) cardiomyopathy is based on the best available evidence of clinical effectiveness. The PICO format was used to generate a list of questions focused on the effectiveness and safety of the specific treatment of patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy. The search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane and Epistemokus, between July-August 2020, and selected articles between 2000-2020, in English and Spanish. The level of evidence and recommendations were analyzed and classified by the GRADE system. The following drugs were included in the analysis: tafamidis, diflunisal, inotersen, patisiran y doxycycline and ursodeoxycholic acid. The expert panel had an agreement that tafamidis 80mg/daily is the only available drug with moderate evidence and weak recommendation for the reduction of total mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, heart failure hospitalization and progression of the disease in patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy and NYHA class = 3. In contrast, tafamidis 20 mg/daily had low-quality evidence in this group of patients. The expert panel did not recommend inotersen, patisiran and diflunisal in patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy due to the lack of supporting evidence, local drug availability, and the potential risk of toxicity. When patients did not have access to tafamidis, the expert panel stated a weak recommendation to use doxycycline and ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with ATTR cardiomyopathy.

Con el propósito de confeccionar una guía con la mejor evidencia disponible en el tratamiento de la amiloidosis por depósito de transtiretina (ATTR), se generó un listado de preguntas en formato PICO centradas en la efectividad y seguridad y se realizó una búsqueda en PubMed, Cochrane y Epistemokus de los artículos publicados entre 2000-2020 y se incluyeron dos estudios de extensión en relación al tafamidis. Los niveles de evidencia y los grados de recomendación se basaron en el sistema GRADE, emitiéndose 11 recomendaciones para ATTRv y ATTwt. Se consideraron los siguientes fármacos: tafamidis, diflunisal, inotersen, patisiran y doxiciclina más ácido ursodesoxicolico. El grupo de expertos consensuó que el único tratamiento que demostró reducir de la mortalidad global, mortalidad cardiovascular, internaciones cardiovasculares y la progresión de la cardiopatía con un nivel moderado de evidencia fue el tafamidis 80 mg, mientras que para la formulación tafamidis 20 mg la calidad de evidencia es baja. Para inotersen y diflunisal, se formuló una recomendación en contra del tratamiento dada la falta de evidencia de calidad respecto a su efectividad, el perfil de toxicidad y la falta de disponibilidad en el ámbito local. Con respecto al patisirán, la recomendación se focalizó en la población ATTRv. El panel de expertos consensuó que el tratamiento con doxiciclina más ácido ursodeoxicólico podría ser utilizado ante la imposibilidad de iniciar tratamiento con tafamidis, recomendación débil y calidad de evidencia muy baja.

2-Substituted Benzoxazoles as Potent Anti-Inflammatory Agents: Synthesis, Molecular Docking and In vivo Anti-Ulcerogenic Studies.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the commonly used therapeutic interventions of inflammation and pain that competitively inhibit the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. Several side effects like gastrointestinal and renal toxicities are associated with the use of these drugs. The therapeutic anti-inflammatory benefits of NSAIDs are produced by the inhibition of COX-2 enzymes, while undesirable side effects arise from the inhibition of COX-1 enzymes. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, a new series of 2-substituted benzoxazole derivatives 2(a-f) and 3(ae) were synthesized in our lab as potent anti-inflammatory agents with outstanding gastro-protective potential. The new analogs 2(a-f) and 3(a-e) were designed depending upon the literature review to serve as ligands for the development of selective COX-2 inhibitors. METHODS: The synthesized analogs were characterized using different spectroscopic techniques (FTIR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR) and elemental analysis. All synthesized compounds were screened for their binding potential in the protein pocket of COX-2 and evaluated for their anti-inflammatory potential in animals using the carrageenan-induced paw edema method. Further 5 compounds were selected to assess the in vivo anti-ulcerogenic activity in an ethanol-induced anti-ulcer rat model. RESULTS: Five compounds (2a, 2b, 3a, 3b and 3c) exhibited potent anti-inflammatory activity and significant binding potential in the COX-2 protein pocket. Similarly, these five compounds demonstrated a significant gastro-protective effect (**p<0.01) in comparison to the standard drug, Omeprazole. CONCLUSION: Depending upon our results, we hypothesize that 2-substituted benzoxazole derivatives have excellent potential to serve as candidates for the development of selective anti-inflammatory agents (COX-2 inhibitors). However, further assessments are required to delineate their underlying mechanisms.

Health impact of tafamidis in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy patients: an analysis from the Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) and the open-label long-term extension studies.

AIM: The Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) showed that tafamidis reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). This study aimed to estimate the impact of tafamidis on survival and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-state, cohort, Markov model was developed to simulate the disease course of ATTR-CM throughout a lifetime. For survival extrapolation, survival curves were fitted by treatment arm and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I/II (68% of patients) and NYHA Class III (32% of patients) cohorts using the individual patient-level data from both the ATTR-ACT and the corresponding long-term extension study. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were conducted. The predicted mean survival for the total population (NYHA Class I/II + III) was 6.73 years for tafamidis and 2.85 years for the standard of care (SoC), resulting in an incremental mean survival of 3.88 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-5.66]. Of the 6.73 life-years, patients on tafamidis spend, on average, 4.82 years in NYHA Class I/II, while patients on SoC spend an average of 1.60 life-years in these classes. The combination of longer survival in lower NYHA classes produced a QALY gain of 5.39 for tafamidis and 2.11 for SoC, resulting in 3.29 incremental QALYs (95% CI 1.21-4.74) in favour of tafamidis. CONCLUSION: Based on the disease simulation model results, tafamidis is expected to more than double the life expectancy and QALYs of ATTR-CM patients compared to SoC. Longer-term follow-up data from the ATTR-ACT extension study will further inform these findings. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01994889 (date of registration: 26 November 2013).